The Chevrolet Tracker LSi for 2000
Those in the market for a truck who buy a Chevrolet Tracker are often enthusiastic about their purchase. Since its launch the Tracker has been one of the flagships of the Chevrolet brand. This has always been a meaningful truck, and the 2000 model is no different. A sport utility for everyone in the family is what the Chevrolet Tracker provides.
2000 Chevrolet Tracker LSi Specs
Chevrolet Tracker Engine Specs: The Tracker LSi comes outfitted with a 1.6 liter, 4-cylinder motor that uses 16 valves. The engine, manufactured by Suzuki, is mated to a four-speed transmission by Aisin Warner. This arrangement has demonstrated to be an effective style for Chevrolet.
The fuel system for the 2000 Tracker is a traditional MPI, running on gasoline fuel. The fuel is controlled by an electronic system and is a fuel-injected MFI design. The capacity of the fuel tank is 14.80 gallons.
The front brakes are disc while the rear brakes are drum. Steering is handled through a power-steering rack-style configuration. The Tracker uses power-assisted brakes, with Non-ABS support. Load balancing is provided by coil front springs and coil in the rear.
Statistics
The Tracker is 151.60 inches long, 67.30 inches wide, and 66.50 inches high. It has a wheelbase of 86.60 inches. It is able to seat 4 comfortably.
The original manufacturer suggested retail price (MSRP) was $13,975 when new, with a dealer invoice cost of $13,164. This price was in line with the industry average price for a 2-door Sport Utility.
A powertrain guarantee is provided (36,000 miles/36 months), and a 36,000 mile, 36 month guarantee also comes with the Chevrolet Tracker. This is average compared to the rest of the truck market.
Fuel Efficiency
The Tracker LSi received a miles-per-gallon rating of 23 - 25 in-city driving and 25 - 28 when it came to highway driving. Being a gas-powered non-hybrid truck, this was within normal parameters.
Parting Shots
There are several reasons why the Chevrolet Tracker LSi sold well in 2000. Mainly the increase in availability and a marked improvement in quality meant the buying public was more apt to choose a Chevrolet, specifically a Tracker.
Kia? Really? I don’t see them as competition…